Editing User talk:Rose

From TemeraireWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 64: Line 64:
 
[[User:Rose|Rose]] 15:18, 4 October 2008 (PDT)
 
[[User:Rose|Rose]] 15:18, 4 October 2008 (PDT)
  
 
Okay, I've got an idea.  In "real history", the Prime Minister of the UK from March 1807 to October 1809 was the Duke of Portland.  He was followed by Spencer Perceval, October 1809 to May 1812 (when he was assassinated).  Mulgrave was First Lord of the Admiralty until 1810.  George III's son (also named George) became regent for his father in 1811.  He was expected to put the Whigs under Lord Grenville into power, ousting Perceval, but he didn't.  Instead, he asked the Whigs to join with Perceval.
 
 
In "Temeraire history", the regency begins earlier, after the Battle of Shoeburyness, while the Duke of Portland is still PM.  Let's say that the Prince Regent and Portland don't get along, so the Prince Regent goes ahead and puts Lord Grenville into power.  Since the position of First Lord of the Admiralty is something of a political plum, Mulgrave is also booted out.
 
 
Now Confucianism has a virtue called Ren - humanity or humaneness.  It's expressed in the rule, "What you do not wish for yourself, do not do to others."  (Kind of the Golden Rule approached from the opposite direction - you're not enjoined to do good things, but rather to avoid doing bad ones.)  Confucianism is also strong on Zhong, loyalty.
 
 
So what if the Chinese were presented with the following facts:
 
*1) The King of England was ill and mad at the time his ministers made the decision to spread the Dragon Plague to the Continent.  He was not aware of this action being taken.
 
*2) Laurence and Temeraire effectively thwarted this action, thus preventing a violation of "Ren" from happening in the King's name.  This can in fact be seen as an act of loyalty.
 
*3) The ministers, again without the King's knowledge, had Laurence placed under sentence of death and Temeraire imprisoned in the breeding grounds.
 
*4) Laurence and Temeraire's role in expelling Napoleon's armies from Britain is another act of loyalty.
 
*5) The King's son has taken over the government during his father's illness to avoid any more wrongful acts from being committed his father's name.  (Filial piety, Xiao)  The evil ministers have been removed from government.
 
*6) Out of loyalty, Laurence and Temeraire have agreed to leave Britain at the government's request.  (Hammond can drop vague hints that this is to avoid them becoming a centre for rebellious elements, not mentioning that Temeraire himself is the most rebellious of the elements.  He's a diplomat, lying skillfully is his job.)
 
 
If the Chinese just sort of try to ignore the actions of the British, they'll lose face.  I'm guessing that this is the main problem rather than any real desire for revenge.  The line of reasoning I've outlined satisfies the demands of face, much as Laurence's distant relationship to the Plantagenets and his adoption by the Emperor makes it possible for him and Temeraire to be sworn as companions.  There was a problem (evil ministers), it was thwarted by Laurence and Temeraire, the King's son has taken steps to ensure that the problem does not recur.
 
 
Laurence comes off looking pretty good, especially for a guy who's never read the Analects.  (Maybe it's a chance remark by Temeraire that gives Hammond the idea to pursue this line of reasoning?  Temeraire would certainly be quick to agree that Laurence is both humane and loyal.)
 
 
Quite aside from the issue of diplomatic relations with the Chinese, this might give Laurence a new way to think about what he's done, not as treason but as a sort of deeper loyalty that would act to prevent genocide from being perpetrated in his country's name?
 
 
[[User:Rose|Rose]] 17:45, 20 October 2008 (PDT)
 
  
 
==Will Ferris go to Australia?==
 
==Will Ferris go to Australia?==

Please note that all text contributions to the Temeraire Wiki may be used and edited by others.
If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED TEXT OR IMAGES WITHOUT PERMISSION!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)