Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rankin family"
From TemeraireWiki
Wombat1138 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So, to speculate, do we think that the Earl Of Kensington represents a district of London, or Liverpool? [[User:Almaron|Almaron]] 22:53, 23 August 2010 (PDT) | So, to speculate, do we think that the Earl Of Kensington represents a district of London, or Liverpool? [[User:Almaron|Almaron]] 22:53, 23 August 2010 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :There's an old Google Books cite that in 1624, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_of_Holland Earl of Holland] (of the Holland region of Lincolnshire) was also named [http://books.google.com/books?id=hz4BAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA170 Earl of Kensington]. However, I'm not finding confirmation in any other sources, all of which so far limit the "Kensington" peerage level to a barony, nor a specific cite of where their "Kensington" was located. --[[User:Wombat1138|Wombat1138]] 23:15, 23 August 2010 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:15, 24 August 2010
So, to speculate, do we think that the Earl Of Kensington represents a district of London, or Liverpool? Almaron 22:53, 23 August 2010 (PDT)
- There's an old Google Books cite that in 1624, the Earl of Holland (of the Holland region of Lincolnshire) was also named Earl of Kensington. However, I'm not finding confirmation in any other sources, all of which so far limit the "Kensington" peerage level to a barony, nor a specific cite of where their "Kensington" was located. --Wombat1138 23:15, 23 August 2010 (PDT)
